Ron,
This IRS propaganda piece is not about the We the People Organization based out of New York that some of our members are affiliated with. It is about an entirely different organization base out of California.
Also, after following the Larken Rose trial, it is obvious that we have to take anything the government says with a grain of salt.
In its persecution of Mr. Rose as I understand it, the government did not put forward one shred of sound evidence. Instead they focused on villifying Mr. Rose and strove to keep compelling evidence from the Jury.
Our government is obviously very good at winning convictions. However, winning a trial and winning the argument are two separate issues. Unfortunately, we may never know the merits of the different arguments advanced by people such as Mr. Rose, because as we just witnessed, the government is also very good at burying the true arguments in the case.
The IRS had an excellent opportunity to address the six questions Mr. Rose has been asking for over seven years. Answering those questions adequately could have dispelled myths and deflated the issue. Instead, they evaded those questions throughout the trial and strove to prevent Mr. Rose from presenting his case to the Jury. Sadly, this tactic has only served to fuel further suspicions.
This is a disturbing tactic and we will be analyzing the transcripts and audio of the Larken Rose trial and will be posting our findings to the web.
I believe we may be in contact with one juror who sought us out. (I need to confirm he is legate and not a hoax).
Let me close with a quote from a juror from the Joe Bannister trial:
"It is still bothering that there was no factual or circumstantial evidence that supported a guilty verdict. Even a blind man could have seen that! Again, what were the motives of the government if it did not have a case?" --Oscar S. Ramirez, Ph.D., juror in Joe Banister's 2005 trial