The Libertarian Party of Pennsylvania - Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the LPPa forum. 
Feel free to join the discussions.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: October 06, 2008, 10:01:04 pm 
Started by jkarr - Last post by Mik
Fair enough!

 2 
 on: October 06, 2008, 09:59:07 pm 
Started by Brandon Magoon - Last post by Mik
This will be in the Supreme Court Middle District, which is in Harrisburg I believe (434 Main Capitol Building?). Wouldn't it be odd if a favorable ruling came down just as Bob Barr was walking past on Wednesday?

 3 
 on: October 06, 2008, 04:01:22 pm 
Started by jkarr - Last post by jkarr
I have contacted the Division of Campaign and Lobbying Finance Disclosure, and obtained a copy of the Campaign finance Law. The key fact is that an individual who spends more than $100 to advocate or oppose the election of a Candidate in a Calendar year is required to file http://www.dos.state.pa.us/campaignfinance/lib/campaignfinance/050forms_online/dseb_505.pdf
I have asked a minor official at the Division if there was any determination if in the case such as my flyer where the majority of the piece is for a candidate for federal office whether the expense can be allocated, in which case anyone within the federal limit of $250 could be excused from filing dseb 505. The worst case is that anyone spending over $100 on these flyers be prepared to file dseb 505.
With the disclaimer on the flyer, no candidate could be held accountable for the flyers.
In the case of someone running for office producing my flyer and having their name added to the ticket (which I can easily accomodate), they would probably need to treat it as a campaign expenditure for their own finance reports.

 4 
 on: October 06, 2008, 03:53:51 pm 
Started by Mik - Last post by bdively
Reason is coming.  But his several of his events in Harrisburg are being adjusted.  Stay tuned.

 5 
 on: October 06, 2008, 01:22:37 pm 
Started by Transpower - Last post by Transpower
Columbus Day Celebrates Western Civilization
By Thomas A. Bowden


On October 12, 1492, Christopher Columbus discovered the New World, opening a sea route to vast uncharted territories that awaited the spread of Western civilization. Centuries later, the ensuing cultural migration culminated in the birth and explosive growth of the greatest nation in history: the United States of America.

It is fitting that we have set aside a day to honor the Great Explorer. On one level, Columbus Day honors the man himself for his many virtues. Columbus was a man of independent mind, who steadfastly pursued his bold plan for a westward voyage to the Indies despite powerful opposition--a man of courage, who set sail upon a trackless ocean with no assurance that he would ever reach land--a man of pride, who sought recognition and reward for his achievements.

We need not evade or excuse Columbus’s flaws--his religious zealotry, his enslavement and oppression of natives--to recognize that he made history by finding new territory for a civilization that would soon show mankind how to overcome the age-old scourges of slavery, war, and forced religious conversion.

Thus, the deeper meaning of Columbus Day is to celebrate the rational core of Western civilization, which flourished in the New World like a pot-bound plant liberated from its confining shell, demonstrating to the world what greatness is possible to man at his best.

On Columbus Day, we celebrate the civilization whose philosophers and mathematicians, men such as Aristotle, Archimedes, and Euclid, displaced otherworldly mysticism by discovering the laws of logic and mathematical relationships, demonstrating to mankind that reality is a single realm accessible to human understanding.

On Columbus Day, we celebrate the civilization whose scientists, men such as Galileo, Newton, Darwin, and Einstein, banished primitive superstitions by discovering natural laws through the scientific method, demonstrating to mankind that the universe is both knowable and predictable.

On Columbus Day, we celebrate the civilization whose political geniuses, men such as John Locke and the Founding Fathers, defined the principles by which bloody tribal warfare, religious strife, and, ultimately, slavery could be eradicated by constitutional republics devoted to protecting life, liberty, property, and the selfish pursuit of individual happiness.

On Columbus Day, we celebrate the civilization whose entrepreneurs, men such as Rockefeller, Ford, and Gates, transformed an inhospitable wilderness populated by frightened savages into a wealthy nation of self-confident producers served by highways, power plants, computers, and thousands of other life-enhancing products.

On Columbus Day, in sum, we celebrate Western civilization as history’s greatest cultural achievement. What better reason could there be for a holiday?

Mr. Bowden is an analyst at the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights and is the author of “The Enemies of Christopher Columbus.” The Ayn Rand Center is a division of the Ayn Rand Institute and promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of “Atlas Shrugged” and “The Fountainhead.”

 
 

Copyright © 2008 Ayn Rand® Center for Individual Rights. All rights reserved.

Op-eds, press releases and letters to the editor produced by the Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights are submitted to hundreds of newspapers, radio stations and Web sites across the United States and abroad, and are made possible thanks to voluntary contributions.

If you would like to help support ARC's efforts, please make an online contribution at http://www.aynrandcenter.org/support.

This release is copyrighted by the Ayn Rand Center, and cannot be reprinted without permission except for noncommercial, self-study or educational purposes. We encourage you to forward this release to friends, family, associates or interested parties who would want to receive it for these purposes only. Any reproduction of this release must contain the above copyright notice. Those interested in reprinting or redistributing this release for any other purposes should contact media@aynrandcenter.org. This release may not be forwarded to media for publication.

ARC's media releases are solicitations sent to addresses obtained from individual subscription requests. You are subscribed as transpower@aol.com. If you prefer not to receive future releases, visit our Web site to change your email preferences.

The Ayn Rand Center for Individual Rights, 555 12th Street NW, Suite 620 N, Washington, DC 20004
 

 6 
 on: October 06, 2008, 12:00:37 pm 
Started by Brandon Magoon - Last post by bdively
So is anyone attending and is this again being held in Philadelphia? 

 7 
 on: October 06, 2008, 02:08:18 am 
Started by Brandon Magoon - Last post by Mik
According to Richard Winger's site, the appeal is to be heard the week of October 6th, not necessarily on the 6th, as I had heard.

http://www.ballot-access.org/

Mik

 8 
 on: October 06, 2008, 01:51:00 am 
Started by Brandon Magoon - Last post by djahn
As far as this case goes, Barr is the least of my worries.  The final outcome of this case will effect how we conduct signature drives in the future, long after Barr is gone.  I seem to recall Stretton raising a constitutional issue.  If so, he may be laying the foundation for a federal appeal.  I can't recall the issue he raised.  It could have been the state constitution in which case that wouldn't help with a federal appeal.

David Jahn

The Supreme Court is the last stop for PA law. There would be no point to an appeal even if there were federal issues to resolve. There would be no time to restore Barr to the ballot. At that point some counties would likely have Barr on and some would not. If a ruling takes a week or so to be forthcoming, it is likely that most counties will certify their ballots with Barr on regardless of the outcome as time is running short.

Again, you can never tell how a court will rule, but there is just no evidence to reverse the Commonwealth Court ruling. Rochelle was never even called to the stand to testify in the hearing, so there is no direct testimony to review her intent. You only get one shot to make your case, and the objector did not make a very good case. There is only what was presented to review on appeal, I don't believe new arguments can be made unless some new evidence is uncovered.

The bottom line is that Judge Johnny Butler got it right, and it would be an enormous stretch for the Supreme Court to interpret the evidence differently, not that it cannot happen.

 9 
 on: October 06, 2008, 12:57:29 am 
Started by Brandon Magoon - Last post by Mik
The Supreme Court is the last stop for PA law. There would be no point to an appeal even if there were federal issues to resolve. There would be no time to restore Barr to the ballot. At that point some counties would likely have Barr on and some would not. If a ruling takes a week or so to be forthcoming, it is likely that most counties will certify their ballots with Barr on regardless of the outcome as time is running short.

Again, you can never tell how a court will rule, but there is just no evidence to reverse the Commonwealth Court ruling. Rochelle was never even called to the stand to testify in the hearing, so there is no direct testimony to review her intent. You only get one shot to make your case, and the objector did not make a very good case. There is only what was presented to review on appeal, I don't believe new arguments can be made unless some new evidence is uncovered.

The bottom line is that Judge Johnny Butler got it right, and it would be an enormous stretch for the Supreme Court to interpret the evidence differently, not that it cannot happen.

 10 
 on: October 05, 2008, 10:34:19 pm 
Started by Brandon Magoon - Last post by bdively
Hypothetically, if we lose this suit, do we appeal?



Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com