Letters to the Editor PDF Print Email
Written by Kurt Tischer   
Tuesday, 28 August 2007 14:36

In this section you will find two LTEs written by Mark Crowley to help with the push for the Voters Choice Act. The first one (about 160 words) mentions the pay grab so it can be seasoned to taste with outrage. The second one (about 150 words) uses the standard "incumbent party" rhetoric and mentions the unfairness of the ballot access signature requirements. These are stand-alone LTEs and can be used as such. They also could be used as templates for writers to adjust as they see fit.

The sample letters to the editor are courtesy of Mark Crowley

Voters Choice Act LTE #1

Dear Editor:

The legislative pay grab in Harrisburg confirms that our legislators need to develop an appreciation of what it means to act in the best interests of Pennsylvanians. Losing their jobs, as the PA Clean Sweep organization (www.pacleansweep.org) proposes, is one such way to teach them that lesson.

Unfortunately, we won't get a chance to fully exercise this option until November 2006. Until then, what?

Let's pressure our incumbent legislature to sponsor and pass the Voters Choice Act (www.PaBallotAccess.org). This act, written by a coalition of Libertarian, Green and Constitution party members, would lower the ballot access barriers imposed on third party and independent candidates for statewide office.

If we push for this act now and the legislature leaves it unsponsored or buried in committee, then that will help to keep the pay raise outrage alive and will most certainly justify keeping it alive.

Let's challenge our legislators to pass the Voters Choice Act. At worst we'll identify those legislators who fear unemployment enough to defend their unvouchered incumbency.

<Name>
<Community>
<Address>
<Daytime Phone>


Voters Choice Act LTE #2

Dear Editor:

I urge Pennsylvanians to support the Voters Choice Act (www.PaBallotAccess.org) and give the entrenched political establishment some competition.

For too many years Pennsylvania has been in decline. Through it all we've had essentially one stagnant, political party with two exclusive factions - Democratic and Republican machines.

In 2006 the deck is stacked so badly against third party and independent candidates for statewide office that it will take over 67,000 valid petition signatures to get on the November ballot. Statewide D&R party nominees, however, require zero signatures. (That's no misprint - zero!)

The Voters Choice Act will help to reduce this unfair, unjust and unconscionable signature requirement. Then these statewide candidates will be able to spend time and effort challenging the R&D incumbents instead of collecting signatures. That will, in turn, give Pennsylvania's voters more choice.

Ask your state representative and senator to support the Voters Choice Act. It's fair and it's about time.

<Name>
<Community>
<Address>
<Daytime Phone>


Crash Course in Letters to the Editor

  • For starters, read the letters that get printed. They give you clues as to what they want. I'm not talking about the opinions or subjects, but the wording. How long? Big words or little words? Formal or conversational? Read the letters for several weeks to look for successful templates.
  • Letters when printed often have one or two sentences per paragraph. Editors will change the letter to make it that way. I think they do this because text is more inviting when there are several short paragraphs with white space in between them. Nobody want to read one big long paragraph. That said, why not try to write that way in the first place? It might give you another edge in getting printed.
  • You probably have a better chance getting printed if you write about something that the paper's reporters wrote. They like to know someone is reading their stuff. This mean keep it reasonably current.
  • For a letter, try to keep the number of words less than 200. You stand a better chance of getting printed. Most word processors have a word count feature. If your word processor also gives a "grade level" estimate of your writing, try to keep the words at the high school level or lower. Say 9th to 12th grade.
  • You can also write about a high-interest story where they get a ton of letters, but you might need an angle to stand out from the crowd to make your point. For example, everyone wants to write about the legislature's pay raise. Find and angle to make it unique. My angle might be to not complain directly about the payraise. I might point out that some legislators say they work hard and put in long hours that should be compensated. (Avoid calling them "lazy" or "greedy" or "unprincipled" even though they might be.) Instead say that all those hours mean that our state government is too big, too intrusive and is in too many things. Their wanting a payraise is more a symptom of a too-big government than of greedy legislators. Thus, our legislators should cut government and not temporarily hide the real problem with a payraise.
  • Email your letters. It's the fastest and best way. Don't fax or send by US mail. I only know of one local paper that doesn't list an email address for letters.
  • Don't email your letter in an attachment. Simply put the text in the email and send it. Most papers will reject emails with attachments.
  • Always include contact information in your letter so that they can contact you to confirm that you want the letter to be printed. They also want a local community name (Plum, Monroeville, Pittsburgh, Wilkinsburg, etc.) to put with your name. Give them a daytime phone number as a contact. If you're writing to a paper across the state just put your city.
  • Occasionally the editor will change your letter when printed. I've found that when that happens, they usually improve the letter. I've seen them clean up some of my awkward wording. They are, after all, writing and/or journalism majors.
  • Nearly all papers have a "one a month" policy on letters. That means, once you get a letter printed, you're under a blackout by that paper for a month. No conspiracy here -- they're just trying to give everyone a chance.
  • If you don't hear from a paper in a few days, then normally they won't print it. They only call to get confirmation if they want to print it. (I say "normally" but the Pittsburgh Tribune Review often prints my letters and they don't call for confirmation. They must know me well enough to see if my words are "in character.")
  • Look at not getting printed is an opportunity and don't get depressed. You can always "recycle" the letter and send it to another paper. I do that all the time. I usually will wait a week or so and try another paper, but make a few adjustments to the letter or try a different angle. Always save your old letters and have some way to retrieve them.
Last Updated on Saturday, 03 May 2008 21:52
 
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Twitter
  • Windows Live
  • Facebook
  • VZ
  • MySpace
  • deli.cio.us
  • Digg
  • Folkd
  • Like to learn German in Stuttgart?
  • Linkarena
  • Mister Wong
  • Newsvine
  • reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yigg